According to Pedro Fontainhas, the Government is "wanting to put an end to something that ended a year ago when it removed the possibility of investing in urban centres with golden visas", noting that the executive now aims to end "what was left out, investment in trade and services units, as is the case of tourist units".

"The tourist units are not housing", he underlined, indicating that "they constitute a parallel real estate offer integrated" in a "set of tourist services and which is intended for temporary use and holidays for Portuguese and foreigners".

Instability

According to Pedro Fontainhas, "these units even have a positive effect, of reducing the demand for temporary housing", arguing that it is "an imprudent measure because once again we are showing the total instability of our legal and fiscal system", which "transmits a bad image of Portugal and the Government", he assured.

"Since this was announced we have had numerous customers, investors suspending their investments" and being "on the back foot" due to the Government's announcement, he said.

According to data released by Pedro Fontainhas, "in 2022, the year in which it was already impossible to invest in ARI [Residence Permits for Investment activities, or golden visas] for housing in urban centres, 534 million euros of investment, that is, a potential of more than three billion euros over five years".

The association leader also said that the measure "fails due to the disrespect for the heterogeneity of the country", highlighting that "Portugal is not just Lisbon and Porto".

"Even if the ARI were a problem in the lack of housing in Lisbon and Porto, which they are not, why punish all regions equally, and some regions" depend "heavily on tourism and the capture of this investment in the tourist product".

Proposals

The association is therefore working on a draft of various measures to be proposed in this context.

"The first measure is for the Government to set aside a period of reflection of at least one year to carry out independent studies of the objective impact of the pros and cons of the measure and not to do things on its own," said Pedro Fontainhas.

The association leader also suggested reviewing "the minimum allocation value of the ARI even in tourist units", given that "it may be the case that Portugal is a little below the competition in terms of the minimum threshold and the rise could create more barriers to entry and more taxes for the state".

For the association, it was also important "to create a special tourist surcharge for the acquisition of tourist real estate in return for a residence permit and which, for example, would finance the construction or lease of affordable housing" and move forward with an ARI "for investment in construction of affordable rental properties".

Finally, the association leader appealed to eliminate the use of the term golden visas, because "it has become completely toxic".

The association promises that it will participate in the public discussion of the measures, having already asked the Government for meetings.